This is part three of a paper I wrote in grad school on C. S. Lewis and Postmodernism. You can read part one here, and part two here.
--------------------------Derrida (Left) and C. S. Lewis (Right |
Lest anyone think C. S. Lewis was a radical postmodernist, it is prudent to point out one of the biggest obstacles: in The Abolition of Man, Lewis writes against the philosophy that assumes that all values are subjective, declaring the existence of the "reality beyond all predicates", "the Tao" (18). The Tao as defined by Lewis is "the doctrine of objective value, the belief that certain attitudes are really true, and others really false" (18). He discusses the inconsistencies in the theory that says all values are subjective when in the very act of making that statement the person who has made the statement has placed value on one not believing that any value would be absolute.
C. S. Lewis is most definitely still relevant in our postmodern age. His writings are not going anywhere anytime soon. At the end of The Abolition of Man, Lewis says that those who want to debunk or “see through” normal traditional or conventional truth or morality should be cautious. The following passage is a perfect word of caution to the more radical postmodernists:
C. S. Lewis is most definitely still relevant in our postmodern age. His writings are not going anywhere anytime soon. At the end of The Abolition of Man, Lewis says that those who want to debunk or “see through” normal traditional or conventional truth or morality should be cautious. The following passage is a perfect word of caution to the more radical postmodernists:
You cannot go on 'explaining away' forever: you will find that you have explained explanation itself away. You cannot go on 'seeing through' things forever. The whole point of seeing through something is to see something through it. It is good that the window should be transparent, because the street or garden beyond it is opaque. How if you saw through the garden too? It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To see through all things is the same as not to see." (Lewis 81)
Works
Cited
Derrida,
Jacques. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan
Bass. Chicago : U of Chicago , 1978. 278-93.
Lévi-Strauss,
Claude. “Overture” Mythologiques. (1964-71)
Lewis,
C. S. The Abolition of Man. New
York : Harper Collins, 2001.
---.
The Great Divorce. New York : Collier, 1946.
Starr, Charlie. “Meaning, Meanings, and Epistemology in C. S. Lewis.” Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S.
Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature. Spring/Summer 2007.
Issue 97/98, Volume 25, Number 3/4. 161-182. ed. Janet Brennan Croft. Altadena , CA :
The Mythopoeic Society, 2007.
---------------------------------------------
In response to the 31 Day blogging challenge, I will be posting every day in October. You can read previous posts HERE. Follow me on Facebook and/or Twitter to be notified of new posts. You can also Subscribe to get posts sent to you by email. (There is a simple form towards the top on the right where you can do this.)
Feel free to comment with your own thoughts and questions!
Index of Posts:
Day 1: 31 Days of C. S. Lewis (Introduction)
Day 2. C. S. Lewis on Longing (In "The Weight of Glory")
Day 3. C. S. Lewis on Sehnsucht (Longing and Desire in The Weight of Glory)
Day 4. C. S. Lewis Audio Recordings
Day 5: C. S. Lewis Online Resources
Day 6: C. S. Lewis: The Intolerable Compliment (The Problem of Pain)
Day 7: C. S. Lewis: What is "The Weight of Glory"?
Day 8: C. S. Lewis: The Great Divorce and The Weight of Glory
Day 9: C. S. Lewis: A Grief Observed
Day 10: C. S. Lewis, Myth, and Postmodernism
Day 11: C. S. Lewis, Myth, and Postmodernism (Part 2)
Day 12: C. S. Lewis and Postmodernism (Part 3 - Conclusion)
No comments:
Post a Comment