I was getting a tad bit frustrated with some of the early (harsh) negative reviews that were being shared. It seemed to me that they were missing the point. So I decided to post links to some of my favorite charitable reviews that have started coming in. If I feel like I have anything to add to the conversation I may post one of my own in the next couple of days. But for now, here are some links with quotes that stood out to me or expressed how I feel:
*Just Added* (11/2/2012)
Rachel Held Evans and the Hermeneutics of Love by Rachel Marie Stone
"This, I think, is what Rachel Held Evans means when she says that she “loves the Bible,” as she says repeatedly and without apology, on her blog, in her book, and even on the Today show: that she loves God and God’s word, and that is why she continues to wrestle with the Bible in spite of its difficult and disturbing parts. Is that not, in fact, an exercise in the hermeneutics of love? If one loves God, and believes the Bible to be God’s word, will not one endeavor to understand the Bible in light of that love, to interpret its disturbing bits as charitably as possible? She quotes philosopher Peter Rollins: “[W]e must attempt to read [the Bible] as one who has been born of God and thus born of love: for that is the prejudice of God.”
Rachel’s project—which involved a playfully imperfect (she repeatedly admits the imperfection) attempt to take the Bible “literally” in the things it says to women—has been interpreted as a “mockery” of the Bible; an exercise in the hermeneutics of suspicion, if you like. But while I have seen critics pick her project apart as everything from unoriginal to straw-woman silliness, I have heard none of them affirm what is her clear aim: to show that the Bible is nowhere applied literally and, moreover, that to apply it literally and rigidly is, more often than not, to miss Scripture’s point in the first place."
Rachel’s project—which involved a playfully imperfect (she repeatedly admits the imperfection) attempt to take the Bible “literally” in the things it says to women—has been interpreted as a “mockery” of the Bible; an exercise in the hermeneutics of suspicion, if you like. But while I have seen critics pick her project apart as everything from unoriginal to straw-woman silliness, I have heard none of them affirm what is her clear aim: to show that the Bible is nowhere applied literally and, moreover, that to apply it literally and rigidly is, more often than not, to miss Scripture’s point in the first place."
A Review of “A Year of Biblical Womanhood” by Rachel Held Evans (or Hermeneutics 101)
"Evans is not mocking the Bible, but exposing the illegitimacy and randomness of a literalist reading of the Bible; the book is an exercise in biblical hermeneutics."
a dangerous woman: a review of Rachel Held Evan’s “Year of Biblical Womanhood” and a giveaway! by Preston
"This book may be to a point about women and their relation to God, man, and each other, but it is ultimately the story of us all---seeking after a God who disclosed Himself to us not through easily reducible terms but through the unfolding of a narrative we have been invited to participate in."
A Woman of Valor, who can find? (A review of Rachel Held Evans’ A Year of Biblical Womanhood) by Micha Boyett
"A project like A Year of Biblical Womanhood, in which Rachel Held Evans spends a year attempting to follow every specific biblical principle applied to women, could easily have come off as a mockery, one more 300-page joke about how the Bible is backward and legalistic and written by women-hating ancients. Instead Evans invites us into her struggle: her love for scripture and her willingness to work through the parts of the Bible that she isn’t quite sure how to make sense of."
"What Rachel Held Evans gives women (and men) like us—those of us who love the Bible and long for it to be used, not as a weapon in combat with other believers, or a list of dos and don’ts by which we measure our worth or judge the worth of others—is the possibility that scripture is a blessing."
A Year of Biblical Womanhood: Understanding and Openness in One Woman’s Journey by Dianna E. Anderson
"Numerous criticisms have been levied against the book –as a mockery of Scripture, as gimmicky, as irreverent – and if you go into the book with that hostile mindset, you may find those things. But that is simply the worldview you bring to the text, not evidenced in the text itself – which, ironically, is the exact same accusation many have leveled on Evans herself."
Thoughts about “A Year of Biblical Womanhood” by Rachel Held Evans from Roger E. Olson
Don’t assume that Evans is snarky, though. She’s not. The tone of her book is mild and kind. Sure, she disagrees with evangelical complementarianism and is out to show its impracticality, but she doesn’t aim insults or hurl anathemas at anyone. And, you might ask, what about complementarianism’s biblicality (to use a non-word)? Well, read the book. Evans uses a lot of Scripture to show that anyone who tries to take it all literally will simply fail. She says “The Bible isn’t an answer book. It isn’t a self-help manual. It isn’t a flat, perspicuous list of rules and regulations that we can interpret objectively and apply unilaterally to our lives.” (p. 293) Also, “The Bible does not present us with a single model of biblical womanhood, and the notion that it contains a sort of one-size-fits –all formula for how to be a woman of faith is a myth.” (p. 294)"
Struggling with the Bible is Not Unbiblical: #BiblicalWomanhood Review #1 - by Camille
"Some reviewers have said that Rachel mocks the Bible, but I wonder what book they were reading….if they read anything at all. Does she employ a little snarky humor? Yes. But I never doubted that she loves the Bible and more importantly, that she loves God. I think to question something and then throw oneself into extensive research and life-interrupting, inconvenient, and uncomfortable situations to answer those questions shows more devotion than blind-acceptance of traditions simply because “that is the way it is.”"
"This book made me want to run to my Bible with a renewed sense of excitement to find the stories of women rarely mentioned in the Sunday-morning service. It made me want to do further research into several theological concepts mentioned."
Biblical Womanhood: Fault Lines & Rachel Held Evans - by Addie Zierman (How to talk Evangelical)
"...I realized that this book is not about labels or division. It wasn’t really ever about complementarianism or egalitarianism or fault lines in the earth. She wrote it because she aches for the forgotten women. The lost ones. The silenced ones. The heart-cry I hear from the pages is not Equality! Feminism! Rights! But rather love."
"She is speaking loud into the culture wars and across the fault lines, and sometimes it feels intense. You might not always agree; you might have chosen to say it differently. But if you listen, really listen, you can hear under all of it the beating of a broken heart. A heart for women. For a faith that doesn’t always make sense. For a church that so often feels inaccessible. Most of all, for God."
This one is not so much a review, but it is part of a link up celebrating the official release day of her new book:
In which I call Rachel Held Evans a woman of valour - by Sarah Bessey
"For a year, she took all of the Bible’s instructions for women as literally as possible. But the book isn’t simply about biblical womanhood or complementarianism vs. egalitarianism. It’s an insightful, wise, and disarming book about how we read and interpret the Bible, how we wrestle with our theology, how we try to live out what we think and believe we know about God."
1 comment:
We'll have to agree to disagree. I don't have a seminary degree, but I think I have learned quite a bit about hermeneutics over the years. Check out Kathy Keller's review here- http://thegospelcoalition.org/book-reviews/review/a_year_of_biblical_womanhood
Would you agree with any of Kathy's points?
Post a Comment